Ministry of Economic Affairs R.O.C.(Taiwan)
Laws and Regulations Retrieving System

Chapter 1 General Provisions

Article 1 Purpose

This Patent Act is formulated to encourage, protect and utilize the creations of invention, utility

model and design in order to promote industrial development.

Article 2 Categories of patents

The term "patent" referred to in this Act is classified into the following three types:

1.invention patent;

2.utility model patent; and

3.design patent.

Article 3 Competent authority

The "competent authority" referred to in this Act is the Ministry of Economic Affairs (hereinafter

referred to as “the MOEA”).

Patent affairs shall be administrated by a specific agency appointed by the MOEA.

Article 4 Acceptance of foreign application

A patent application filed by a foreign applicant shall not be accepted if the home country of such

foreign applicant is not a signatory to an international treaty for protection of patent right to which

the Republic of China (ROC) is a signatory, or if the home country does not conclude with the ROC

a treaty or an agreement for reciprocal protection of patent rights, or if no patent protection

agreement is concluded by and between organizations or institutions of the ROC and said foreign

country and approved by the respective competent authorities, or if the laws of said foreign country

do not accept patent applications filed by ROC nationals.

Article 5 Right to apply for patent

The term "right to apply for a patent" shall mean the right to file a patent application in accordance

with this Act.

Subject to provisions of this Act otherwise prescribed or the covenants otherwise set forth in an

agreement, the term "the owner of the right to apply for a patent" shall mean an inventor, a utility

model creator, a designer, or the assignee or successor thereof.

Article 6 Transference and pledge of patent

The right to apply for a patent or the patent right is both assignable and inheritable.

The right to apply for a patent shall not be taken as the subject of a pledge.

In the case of taking a patent right as the subject of a pledge, the pledgee shall not be allowed to

exploit the patent right, unless it is otherwise provided for in an agreement.

Article 7 Invention made in the performance of duties

Where an invention, a utility model or a design is made by an employee in the course of performing

his/her duties, the right to apply for a patent and the patent right thereof shall be vested in his/her

employer and the employer shall pay the employee reasonable remuneration; where there is an

agreement providing otherwise, such agreement shall prevail.

The so-called "an invention, a utility model or a design made by an employee in the course of

performing his/her duties" as set forth in the preceding paragraph shall mean the invention, utility

model, or design completed by an employee in the course of performing his/her duties during the

period of employment.

Where a fund provider appoints another party to conduct research and development, the ownership

of the right to apply for a patent and the patent right in connection with the outcome of such

research and development shall be vested in the party as mutually agreed upon in an agreement

between both parties, or such rights shall be vested in the inventor, utility model creator or designer

in the absence of such agreement. However, the fund provider shall be entitled to exploit such

invention, utility model or design.

Where the ownership of the right to apply for a patent and the patent right are vested in the

employer or the fund provider pursuant to Paragraph 1 or the preceding paragraph, the inventor,

utility model creator or designer concerned shall be entitled to a right to have his/her name shown as

such.

Article 8 Invention irrelevant to the performance of duties

Where an invention, utility model or design made by an employee has no connection to the course

of performing his/her duties, the right to apply for a patent and the patent right for such invention,

utility model or design shall be vested in the employee. However, if such invention, utility model or

design is made through the utilization of the employer's resources or experiences, the employer may,

after paying the employee a reasonable remuneration, exploit the invention, utility model or design

concerned in the enterprise.

Upon completion of an invention, utility model or design which has no connection to the course of

an employee’s performing his/her duties, the employee shall give the employer a written notice

regarding such event, and shall also inform the employer of the creative process, if necessary.

If the employer fails to raise any objection to the employee within six (6) months after receiving the

employee's written notice under the preceding paragraph, the employer shall not claim that such

invention, utility model or design was made by the said employee in the course of performing

his/her duties.

Article 9 Protection of employees’ legitimate rights

An agreement concluded between an employer and an employee as stated in the preceding article,

based on which the employee is precluded from enjoying legitimate rights and interests in respect of

his/her invention, utility model, or design, shall be void.

Article 10 Agreement on ownership

Where an agreement has been reached by an employer and its employee regarding a dispute over

attribution of right(s) as set forth in Articles 7 and 8 of this Act, the employer or employee

concerned may file a request along with relevant document(s) of proof with the Specific Patent

Agency for change of ownership of the right(s) involved. The Specific Patent Agency may, as it

deems necessary, notify the parties involved to submit document(s) relevant to any mediation,

arbitration or court judgment rendered in accordance with other laws and regulations.

Article 11 Patent Agency

An applicant may designate an agent to file patent applications and handle patent-related matters on

his/her behalf.

An applicant who has no domicile or business establishment in the territory of the ROC shall

designate an agent to file patent applications and handle patent-related matters on his/her behalf.

Eligible agents shall be limited to patent attorneys, unless otherwise provided for by laws and

regulations.

The qualification and administration of patent attorneys shall be separately prescribed by laws.

Article 12 Joint application

Where a right to apply for a patent is jointly owned, the patent application related thereto shall be

filed by all the joint owner(s).

Where two or more persons engage in any patent-related procedure other than filing a patent

application, each of them may complete such procedure independently, except for making a

withdrawal or an abandonment of a patent application, filing an application for division or

conversion, or taking other actions for which this Act requires joint execution. However, if a

representative is designated by a covenant, such covenant shall prevail.

In the case of an event requiring joint execution as set forth in the preceding two paragraphs, one of

the joint owners shall be appointed as the recipient of service of documents. In the absence of such

recipient, the Specific Patent Agency shall name the first-listed joint owner as the recipient and shall

notify other (s) of such service matters.

Article 13 Joint ownership of the right to apply for patent

Where the right to apply for a patent is jointly owned, the right to apply for the patent shall not be

assigned or abandoned without the consent of all joint owners.

Where the right to apply for a patent is jointly owned by two or more persons, none of the joint

owners shall assign his/her own share therein to a third party without the consent of other joint

owners.

Where one of the owners of the right to apply for a patent abandons his/her own share, this share

shall be vested in other joint owner(s).

Article 14 Recordation to have Locus standi against a third party: transference of right to apply for

patent

In the case of an inheritance or assignment of the right to apply for a patent, the successor or the

assignee shall have no locus standi against any third party unless the patent application has been

filed in the name of the successor or the assignee at the time of filing, or a request has been filed

thereafter with the Specific Patent Agency for altering the recordation of applicant.

The request referred to in the preceding paragraph, whether for assignment or inheritance, shall be

accompanied by document(s) of proof.

Article 15 Duty of confidentiality of staff members and patent examiners

While serving in the Specific Patent Agency, staff members or patent examiners shall not apply for a

patent or receive any rights or interests in connection with such patent directly or indirectly, except

for inheritance.

Staff members or patent examiners of the Specific Patent Agency are obligated to keep confidential

any invention, utility model, or design, or the trade secrets of an applicant which have become

known to or been possessed by them in the course of performing their duties; whoever violates such

obligation shall bear relevant legal responsibilities.

The qualification of patent examiners shall be prescribed separately by laws.

Article 16 Avoiding conflict of interests by patent examiners

Patent examiners shall exclude themselves from any of the following circumstances:

1. where, for a concerned patent case, the patent examiner or his/her spouse is the patent applicant,

patentee, invalidation requester, patent agent, a partner of the said patent agent or a person having

employment relationship with the patent agent;

2. where, for a concerned patent case, the patent examiner is presently related to the patent

applicant,patentee, invalidation requester or the patent agent by consanguinity within the fourth

degree or by affinity within the third degree;

3. where, for a concerned patent case, the patent examiner or his/her spouse and the patent applicant,

patentee or invalidation requester are co-obligee(s), co-obligor(s), or debt-paying

co-obligor(s);

4. where, for a concerned patent case, the patent examiner is or was the legal representative, the

family head or a household member of the patent applicant, patentee or invalidation requester;

5. where, for a concerned patent case, the patent examiner is or was the litigation agent or the

assisting party of the patent applicant, patentee or invalidation requester; or

6. where, for a concerned patent case, the patent examiner is or was a witness, an expert witness, an

  opposition requester or an invalidation requester.

Where a patent examiner should have but did not exclude himself/herself from performing his/her

duties, the Specific Patent Agency may, upon request or on its own authority, revoke the measure(s)

already taken and adopt an alternative measure instead.

Article 17 Delay and reinstatement

Unless otherwise provided in this Act, where a person filing a patent application or taking other

proceedings in connection with patent-related matters has failed to comply within a statutory or

specified time period, the application filed or the proceeding initiated shall be dismissed. However,

if the delay of not acting within a specified time period has been remedied before the dismissal

decision is served by the Specific Patent Agency, such application or proceeding shall still be

accepted.

If the delay of a statutory time period is caused by natural calamity or other cause(s) not attributable

to the applicant, the applicant may, within thirty (30) days after cessation of such cause, file a

written request with the Specific Patent Agency stating the cause(s) for delay and requesting for

reinstatement. An application for reinstatement shall not be accepted if the delay has exceeded one

(1) year after expiration of the statutory time period.

While requesting for reinstatement, the applicant shall concurrently fulfill all obligations that should

have been fulfilled within the concerned time period.

The preceding two paragraphs shall not apply to a delay of the time limits as set forth in Paragraph 4

of Article 29, Paragraph 4 of Article 52, Paragraph 2 of Article 70, Paragraph 4 of Article 29

applicable mutatis mutandis under Article 120, Paragraph 4 of Article 52 applicable mutatis

mutandis under Article 120; Paragraph 2 of Article 70 applicable mutatis mutandis under Article

120; Paragraph 4 of Article 29 applicable mutatis mutandis under Paragraph 1 of Article 142;

Paragraph 4 of Article 52 applicable mutatis mutandis under Paragraph 1 of Article 142, and

Paragraph 2 of Article 70 applicable mutatis mutandis under Paragraph 1 of Article 142.

Article 18 Service by publication

Where an examination decision or any other document(s) cannot be served, such decision or

document(s) shall be published in the Patent Gazette and shall be deemed to have been served thirty

(30) days after publication.

Article 19 E-filing

Application for patent and other relevant proceedings may be processed electronically; the

implementation of which shall be prescribed by the competent authority.

Article 20 Calculation of time periods

The duration of relevant time periods as specified in this Act shall not include the beginning date

thereof.

The duration of the patent right as specified respectively in Paragraph 3 of Article 52, Article 114

and Article 135 of this Act shall start to run from the filing date of the patent application concerned.

Chapter 2 Invention Patent

Section 1: Patentability

Article 21 Definition of invention

"Invention" means the creation of technical ideas, utilizing the laws of nature.

Article 22 Substantial conditions

An invention which is industrially applicable may be granted a patent upon application in

accordance with this Act, except for the following:

1. the invention was disclosed in a printed publication prior to the filing of the patent application;

2. the invention was publicly exploited prior to the filing of the patent application; or

3. the invention was publicly known prior to the filing of the patent application.

An invention that is without the circumstances prescribed in the subparagraphs of the preceding

paragraph but can be easily made by a person ordinarily skilled in the art based on prior art shall not

be patented .

A disclosure made by or against the applicant’s will shall not be deemed as one of the circumstances

that would preclude the grant of an invention patent prescribed in the subparagraphs of Paragraph 1

or the preceding paragraph, provided that the concerned patent application is filed within twelve (12)months after the date of the disclosure.

For the publication in a gazette made in this country or a foreign country in accordance with the

laws as the consequence of filing a patent application and made by the applicant’s will, the

preceding paragraph is not applicable.

Article 23 Deemed as lack of novelty

Where an invention claimed in a patent application for invention is identical to an invention or

utility model disclosed in the description, claim(s) or drawing(s) of an earlier-filed patent

application for invention or utility model which is laid open or published after the filing of the

later-filed patent application, an invention patent shall not be granted; however, this shall not apply

where the applicant of the later-filed patent application is also the applicant of the earlier-filed

patent application for invention or utility model.

Article 24 Statutory exclusion

An invention patent shall not be granted in respect of any of the following:

1. animals, plants, and essential biological processes for the production of animals or plants, except

for processes for producing microorganisms;

2. diagnostic, therapeutic and surgical methods for the treatment of humans or animals; or

3. inventions contrary to public order or morality.

Section 2: Application

Article 25 Filing date

A patent application for invention shall be filed with the Specific Patent Agency by the owner of the

right to apply for a patent who is to provide an application form, a description, claim(s), an abstract,

and the necessary drawing(s).

The filing date of a patent application for invention shall be the date on which the application form,

description, claim(s), and the necessary drawing(s) are provided in full.

Where an applicant does not provide a description, claim(s) and the necessary drawing(s) in Chinese

at the time of filing, but in a foreign language, and where the Chinese translation for the said

documents is provided within the time period specified by the Specific Patent Agency, the filing

date shall be the date on which the foreign language version is originally provided.

Where the Chinese translation is not provided within the specified time period as stated in the

preceding paragraph, the patent application shall be dismissed; however, if the Chinese translation is

provided before the dismissal decision is served, the date on which the Chinese translation is

provided shall be regarded as the filing date, and the foreign language version shall be deemed not

to have been provided.

Article 26 Disclosure

The description shall fully disclose the invention in a manner clear and sufficient for it to be

understood and carried out by a person ordinarily skilled in the art.

Claim(s) shall define the claimed invention, and more than one claim may be included therein. Each

claim shall be disclosed in a clear and concise manner and be supported by the description.

An abstract shall clearly contain a summary of the disclosed invention; it shall not be taken into

account for the purpose of determining the sufficiency of the disclosure and the patentability of the

claimed invention.

The manners of disclosure for description, claim(s), abstract, and drawing(s) shall be prescribed in

the Enforcement Rules of the Patent Act.

Article 27 Deposit of biological material

When filing a patent application for invention involving a biological material or utilization of a

biological material, the applicant shall, no later than the filing date, make a deposit of the biological

material with a domestic depository designated by the Specific Patent Agency. No deposit is

required if the biological material involved can be easily obtained by a person ordinarily skilled in

the art.

An applicant shall, within four (4) months after the filing date of patent application, submit to the

Specific Patent Agency a certificate of deposit, indicating the depository, date of deposit and deposit

number. If such document is not submitted within the specified time period, the deposit shall be

deemed not to have been made.

Where priority is claimed pursuant to Article 28, the specified time period set forth in the preceding

paragraph shall be within sixteen (16) months after the priority date.

In the event that, prior to filing the patent application for invention, the biological material

concerned has been deposited in a foreign depository recognized by the Specific Patent Agency, and

where the certificate of deposit issued by the designated domestic depository and the foreign

depository has been provided within the time period prescribed in Paragraph 2 or the preceding

paragraph, the applicant is exempted from the requirement of making a deposit no later than the

filing date, as set forth in Paragraph 1.

If an applicant has deposited the biological material in a depository designated by a foreign country

in its territory with which the ROC recognizes the effects of deposits based on reciprocity, and if the

applicant has submitted the certificate(s) of deposit issued by the said foreign depository within the

time period prescribed in Paragraph 2 or Paragraph 3, the applicant is exempted from the

requirement of making a deposit in the ROC.

The competent authority shall stipulate regulations on the requirements for accession, types, forms,

quantities of deposits of biological materials, deposit fees, and other matters in connection with

making deposits set forth in Paragraph 1.

Article 28 Priority claim under WTO membership, etc.

Where an applicant has first applied for a patent in a foreign country, which reciprocally allows

ROC nationals to claim patent priority, or with any member of the World Trade Organization

(WTO), the applicant may claim priority in respect of an ROC patent application for the same

invention if the ROC patent application for the same invention is filed within twelve (12) months

after the filing date of the said first patent application.

Where an applicant claims two or more priorities in respect of a patent application, the period

referred to in the preceding paragraph shall be on the basis of the earliest priority date.

If a foreign applicant is a citizen of a non-member of the WTO and whose home country does not

mutually recognize priority with the ROC, but the applicant has domicile or business establishment

in any member of the WTO or in the territory of a reciprocal country, the applicant shall also be

entitled to claim priority in accordance with the provisions set forth in Paragraph 1.

For a patent application filed with priority, examination on its patentability shall be based on the

priority date.

Article 29 Claim of priority

An applicant claiming priority in accordance with the preceding article shall simultaneously make a

declaration with respect to the following when filing a patent application:

1. the filing date of the first patent application;

2. the country or member of WTO in which the first patent application was filed; and

3. the application number of the first patent application.

Within sixteen (16) months after the earliest priority date, the applicant shall submit a certified copy

of the first patent application issued by the foreign patent authority under the preceding paragraph.

In case of a violation of Subparagraph 1 or Subparagraph 2 of Paragraph 1 or the preceding

paragraph, the priority claim shall be deemed not to have been made.

Where an applicant unintentionally fails to claim priority claim at the time of filing, or where the

priority claim is deemed not to have been made as prescribed in violation of Subparagraph 1 or

Subparagraph 2 of Paragraph 1, the applicant may, within sixteen (16) months after the earliest

priority date, apply for reinstatement of priority claim, pay the required fees and undertake actions

set forth in Paragraph 1.

Article 30 Priority claim based on earlier application

I An applicant filing a subsequent patent application based on an earlier patent application for

invention or utility model in the ROC may make a priority claim with respect to the invention or

utility model disclosed in the description, claim(s) or drawing(s) submitted for the earlier patent

application. This provision shall not apply under any of the following circumstances:

1. where a period of twelve (12) months has elapsed after the filing date of the earlier patent

 application;

2. where priority has been claimed in accordance with the provisions of Article 28 or this article in

  respect of the invention or utility model disclosed in the earlier patent application;

3. where the earlier patent application is a divisional patent application prescribed under Paragraph

 1 of Article 34 or Paragraph 1 of Article 107, or a converted patent application prescribed under

Paragraph 1 of Article 108;

4. where the earlier patent application is a patent application for invention that has been published or

has been rejected finally and bindingly;

5. where the earlier patent application is a patent application for utility model that has been

  published or has been rejected finally and bindingly; or

6. where the earlier patent application has been withdrawn or dismissed.

The earlier patent application referred to in the preceding paragraph shall be deemed to have been

withdrawn upon an expiry of fifteen (15) months after its filing date.

Priority claimed shall not be withdrawn upon an expiry of fifteen (15) months after the filing date of

the earlier patent application.

In the event that a subsequent patent application filed with priority claim in accordance with

Paragraph 1 is withdrawn within fifteen (15) months after the filing date of the earlier patent

application, the priority claim thus made shall be deemed to have been withdrawn at the same time.

Where an applicant claims two or more priorities for a patent application, the calculation of priority

period shall be on the basis of the earliest priority date.

For a patent application filed with priority, examination on its patentability shall be based on the

priority date.

Where a priority claim is made in accordance with Paragraph 1, the filing date and the application

number of the earlier patent application shall be declared at the time of filing. If such declaration is

not made, priority claim shall be deemed not to have been made.

Article 31 First-to-file principle

Where two or more patent applications are filed for the same invention, only the earliest application

can be granted. The above shall not apply if the priority date claimed for the later-filed application is

earlier than the filing date of the earlier application.

If the filing date and the priority date referred to in the preceding paragraph are the same, the

applicants shall be notified to reach an agreement with respect to the matter concerned. If such an

agreement cannot be reached, none of the applications shall be granted. If the said patent

applications are filed by the same applicant, the applicant shall be notified to select one patent

application within a specified time period; failure to make a selection within the time period shall

result in the rejection of all such patent applications.

While the applicants concerned are in the process of reaching an agreement, the Specific Patent

Agency shall require that these applicants report the results of the negotiation within an appropriate

time period. If the said report is not provided within the specified time period, it shall be deemed

that an agreement has not been reached.

Where a patent application for invention  and a patent application for utility model are filed

separately in respect of the same creation, the provisions set forth in the preceding three paragraphs

shall apply mutatis mutandis, except for the circumstances stipulated in Article 32.

Article 32 One creation applied for invention patent and utility model patent

An applicant filing a patent application for invention and a patent application for utility model for

the same creation on the same date shall make respective declarations in respect of the said

applications. If the patent application for utility model has been granted before an approval decision

on the patent application for invention is rendered, the Specific Patent Agency shall notify the

applicant to make a selection within a specified time period. The patent application for invention

shall not be granted if the applicant fails to make such declarations or selection within the specified

time period.

Where the applicant selects the patent application for invention according to the provision set forth

in the preceding paragraph, the utility model patent right shall become extinguished on the

publication date of the invention patent.

The patent application for invention shall not be granted if the utility model patent right has become

extinguished or has been revoked finally and bindingly before a decision is rendered on the patent

application for invention.

Article 33 Invention Patent

A patent application for invention shall relate to one invention.

Two or more inventions so linked as to form a single general inventive concept may be filed in one

application.

Article 34 Divisional application of invention patent

A patent application that substantially contains two or more inventions may, upon notice by the

Specific Patent Agency or upon request by the applicant, be divided into two or more divisional

applications.

A request for division shall be filed within any of the following time periods:

1. before a reexamination decision on the original patent application is rendered; or

2. within three (3) months after the date on which an approval decision for the original patent

  application or reexamination is served.

The filing date of the divisional patent application shall be the same as the filing date of the original

application. Where the priority claim has been made, the applicant may claim priority for the

divisional patent application.

The divisional patent application shall not extend beyond the scope of content disclosed in the

description, claim(s), or drawing(s) of the original patent application as filed.

For the divisional patent application filed in accordance with Subparagraph 1 of Paragraph 2, the

examination thereof shall resume the completed examination procedure of the original patent

application.

For the divisional patent application filed in accordance with Subparagraph 2 of Paragraph 2, it shall

be based on the invention(s) disclosed in the description or the drawing(s), but shall not be the same

as that have been approved in the original patent application; the examination thereof that has been

conducted before the original patent application is approved shall be resumed.

The description, claim(s), or drawing(s) of the original patent application that have been approved

may not be altered and shall be published based on the claim(s) and drawing(s) as originally

approved.

Article 35 Invalidation action filed by the owner of the right to apply for a patent

Where an invalidation action is filed against a granted patent by the owner of the right to apply for a

patent or by the joint owner(s) of the right to apply for a patent within two (2) years after the

publication date of the patent concerned in accordance with Subparagraph 3, Paragraph 1 of Article

71, and where the said person or joint owner(s) newly files a patent application for the same

invention within two (2) months after the day on which the invalidation decision revoking the patent

has become final and binding, the filing date of the revoked patent shall be the filing date for the

newly filed patent application.

A patent application newly filed in accordance with the preceding paragraph shall not be published

again.

Section 3: Examination and Reexamination

Article 36 Assignment of a patent examiner for examination

The Specific Patent Agency shall assign a patent examiner to conduct the substantive examination

of a patent application for invention.

Article 37 Early publication of patent application

After receiving application documents and determining through examination that the application

conforms to stipulated formality requirement and contains no elements that may be deemed

unsuitable for laying open, the Specific Patent Agency shall lay open the patent application for

invention eighteen (18) months since its filing.

The Specific Patent Agency may advance the laying-open of a patent application upon the request of

the applicant.

A patent application for invention shall not be laid open under any of the following circumstances:

1. where it is withdrawn within fifteen (15) months after its filing date;

2. where it involves national defense secrets or any other secrets pertaining to national security; or

3. where it is contrary to public order or morality.

Where a priority is claimed, the calculation of time period set forth in Paragraph 1 and the preceding

paragraph shall be on the basis of the priority date; where two or more priorities are claimed, the

calculation thereof shall be on the basis of the earliest priority date.

Article 38 Request for substantive examination

A request to the Specific Patent Agency for substantive examination of a patent application for

invention may be made by any person within three (3) years after the filing date of the patent

application.

Where a division request is made pursuant to Paragraph 1 of Article 34 or where a patent application

is converted into a patent application for invention pursuant to Paragraph 1 of Article 108, if the

time period set forth in the preceding paragraph has lapsed, a request for substantive examination

may be made within thirty (30) days after such request for division or conversion.

A request for substantive examination according to the preceding two paragraphs shall not be

withdrawn.

Where a request for substantive examination is not filed within the time period prescribed in

Paragraph 1 or Paragraph 2, the patent application for invention shall be deemed to have been

withdrawn.

Article 39 Request procedures for substantive examination

A request form for substantive examination referred to in the preceding Article shall be submitted.

The Specific Patent Agency shall publish the facts regarding a request for substantive examination

in the Patent Gazette.

Where the substantive examination is requested by a person other than the invention patent

applicant, the Specific Patent Agency shall notify the invention patent applicant of such fact.

Article 40 Prioritized examination of a patent application for invention

The Specific Patent Agency may upon request conduct prioritized examination of a patent

application for invention if it is commercially exploited by a person other than the applicant after it

is laid open.

Relevant document(s) of proof shall be submitted when filing a request referred to in the preceding

paragraph.

Article 41 Effect of laying open an application

An invention patent applicant may, after the publication of an invention patent application, claim

appropriate compensation against the exploiter who, having been given a written notice by the

applicant in respect of the contents of the invention after the laying-open of the invention patent

application, continues to commercially exploit the invention after receiving the notice and prior to

the publication of the said application.

The claim referred to in the preceding paragraph may also be made against a person who is fully

aware that the patent application for invention has been laid open but continues to commercially

exploit the invention prior to its publication.

The right to claim compensation as provided in the preceding two paragraphs does not affect the

exercise of other rights. However, where an applicant having filed a patent application for invention

and a patent application for utility model pursuant to Article 32 of this Act has been granted the

utility model patent, the claim against such exploiter shall only be made based either on the right to

claim compensation or on the utility model patent right.

The right to claim compensation as set forth in Paragraph 1 and 2 shall become extinguished if not

exercised within two (2) years after the publication date of the said invention patent.

Article 42 Interview and inspection in examination of application

When examining a patent application for invention, the Specific Patent Agency may, upon request

or on its own initiative, notify the applicant to conduct any of the following actions within a

specified time period:

1. to appear before the Specific Patent Agency for an interview; or

2. to perform necessary experiment(s) or submit model(s) or sample(s).

The Specific Patent Agency may, when necessary, visit the site or a designated place to carry out

inspection on the experiment(s) performed or model(s) or sample(s) to be  submitted pursuant to

Subparagraph 2 of the preceding paragraph.

Article 43 Amendment during examination; final notice

Unless otherwise stipulated in this Act, when examining a patent application for invention, the

Specific Patent Agency may, upon request or on its own initiative, notify the applicant to amend the

description, claim(s), or drawings within a specified time period.

Except for correction of translation errors, any amendment shall not extend beyond the scope of

content disclosed in the description, claim(s), or drawing(s) as filed.

Where the Specific Patent Agency has issued a notice pursuant to Paragraph 2 of Article 46, a patent

applicant shall only make amendment(s) within the specified time period in the notice.

The Specific Patent Agency may, as it deems necessary, issue a final notice after having issued a

notice prescribed in the preceding paragraph. The applicant who is to amend claim(s) after a final

notice has been issued shall only make the following amendments within the time period specified

therein:

1. to delete claim(s);

2. to narrow down the scope of claim(s);

3. to correct errors; or

4. to clarify ambiguous statement(s).

In case of a violation of the provisions in the preceding two paragraphs, the Specific Patent Agency

shall state the reasons in a written decision and render such decision accordingly.

The Specific Patent Agency may issue a final notice accordingly if the original patent application or

its divisional application meets any of the following conditions:

1. where the content of the notice issued for the original patent application is same as that of the

  notice issued for the divisional patent application;

2. where the content of the notice issued for the divisional patent application is same as that of the

  notice issued for the original patent application; or

3. where the content of the notice issued for a divisional application is same as that of the notice

issued for other divisional application(s).

Article 44 Foreign language documents

Where a patent applicant submits a description, claim(s), and drawing(s) prepared in a foreign

language pursuant to Paragraph 3 of Article 25, such foreign language documents shall not be

amended.

The Chinese translation submitted pursuant to Paragraph 3 of Article 25 shall not extend beyond the

scope of content disclosed in the original foreign language documents as filed.

Any correction of translation errors in the Chinese version as stated in the preceding paragraph shall

not extend beyond the scope of content disclosed in the original foreign language documents as

filed.

Article 45 Decision of examination

Upon completion of examination of a patent application for invention, a written decision shall be

rendered and served on the applicant.

When a patent application is determined to be unpatentable, the reason(s) shall be given in the

written decision of examination.

A written decision of examination shall bear the name of the patent examiner. This requirement shall

also apply to written decisions for reexamination, post-grant amendment, invalidation, patent term

extension and invalidation against patent term extension.

Article 46 Grounds for rejection of invention patent application

When a patent application for invention is in violation of the provisions set forth in Articles 21

through 24, Article 26, Article 31, Paragraphs 1 and 3 of Article 32, Article 33, Paragraph 4 and the

forepart of Paragraph 6 of Article 34, Paragraph 2 of Article 43, Paragraphs 2 and 3 of Article 44, or

Paragraph 3 of Article 108, a decision of rejection shall be rendered.

Before rendering a decision in accordance with the preceding paragraph, the Specific Patent Agency

shall notify the applicant to file a response within a specified time period. If the applicant fails to

make a response within the time period, a decision of rejection shall be rendered accordingly.

Article 47 Publication of patented invention and application for browsing

A claimed invention shall be patented if there is no reason for negating its patentability, and the

claim(s) and the drawing(s) of the patent application shall be published.

Any person may apply for viewing, transcribing, photographing, or photocopying the written

decision of examination, description, claim(s), abstract, drawing(s), and the file wrapper in

connection with a patent application which has been published, except for the information which

should be kept confidential by the Specific Patent Agency in accordance with laws.

Article 48 Reexamination

An invention patent applicant dissatisfied with a decision of rejection may provide reason(s) to

request a reexamination within two (2) months after the date on which the decision of rejection is

served. If the patent application is not accepted or dismissed for formality defects or on the ground

of ineligibility of the applicant, the applicant may directly file administrative remedy actions in

accordance with the laws.

Article 49 Amendment during reexamination

Where a decision of rejection is rendered pursuant to Paragraph 2 of Article 46, the applicant may

amend the description, claims, or drawing(s) during the reexamination stage.

Where a final notice has been issued before the decision of rejection is rendered for a patent

application, any amendment made during the reexamination stage shall still be subject to limitations

set forth in each subparagraph of Paragraph 4 of Article 43. The above shall not apply to

reexamination, if the Specific Patent Agency finds that the final notice issued in the original

examination procedure was improper.

The Specific Patent Agency may issue a final notice accordingly under any of the following

circumstances:

1. where the reason(s) for reexamination still entails grounds for unpatentability;

2. where the amendment(s) made during the reexamination stage still entails grounds for

  unpatentability; or

3. where an amendment made in accordance with the preceding paragraph is in violation of the

  subparagraphs of Paragraph 4 of Article 43.

Article 50 Assignment of a patent examiner for reexamination

For reexamination, the Specific Patent Agency shall assign a patent examiner who did not

participate in the examination of the concerned patent application to conduct reexamination and

render a written decision to be served on the applicant.

Article 51 Confidentiality of invention involving national security

Where, through examination, an invention involves national defense secrets or any other secrets

pertaining to national security, the Ministry of National Defense or relevant national security

authorities shall be consulted for their comments; if it is deemed necessary to keep such invention

confidential, the application documents of the said patent application shall be sealed. If a request for

substantive examination has been filed for the said patent application, an examination decision shall

be rendered and served to the applicant and the inventor.

The applicant, patent agent and the inventor shall keep confidential the invention referred to in the

preceding paragraph; the right to apply for a patent for such invention shall be deemed to have been

abandoned if there is any violation of the confidentiality requirement.

The confidentiality period shall last for one (1) year after the date on which a written decision is

served on the applicant, and such period may be extended on an annual basis. The Specific Patent

Agency shall consult with the Ministry of National Defense or relevant national security authorities

one (1) month prior to the expiration of the confidentiality period and, if confidentiality is no longer

required, such patent application shall be laid open.

Where an invention referred to in Paragraph 1 is approved and where confidentiality is deemed

unnecessary for such patent application, the Specific Patent Agency shall publish the grant of the

invention patent after receiving patent certificate fee and the first-year annuity paid within three (3)

months by the applicant. If the said fees are not paid prior to the time period stated above, no

publication shall be made.

The Government shall pay a considerable compensation for the loss suffered by the applicant during

the confidentiality period.

Section 4: Patent Rights

Article 52 Payment of fees and publication

For a patent application for invention that is approved, the grant of such patent application shall be

published only when the patent certificate fee and the first-year patent annuity are paid by the

applicant within three (3) months after the date on which the approval decision is served; if the fees

are not paid within the said time period, no publication shall be made.

A patent right granted to a patent application for invention shall start from the publication date of

the patent, and a patent certificate shall be issued thereto.

The term of an invention patent shall expire after a period of twenty (20) years from the filing date

of the application.

Where the applicant unintentionally fails to pay the required fees within the time period set forth in

Paragraph 1 or Paragraph 4 of the preceding article, the applicant should pay the patent certificate

fee and two times the first-year patent annuity within six (6) months after the period has expired.

After the said payment has been made, the Specific Patent Agency shall publish the patent.

Article 53 Extension of patent term

Where a regulatory approval shall be obtained in accordance with other laws and regulations for the

exploitation of an invention patent involving a pharmaceutical or agrichemical, or the

manufacturing process thereof, if such regulatory approval is obtained after the publication of the

concerned invention patent, the patentee may apply for one and only one extension of the patent

term of said invention patent based on the first regulatory approval. The said regulatory approval is

allowed to be used only once for seeking patent term extension.

The extension of the patent term approved under the preceding paragraph shall not exceed the

length of time when the patent cannot be exploited because of the filing of a request for the

regulatory approval with the central competent authorities in charge of the business. If the time

needed to obtain the said regulatory approval exceeds five (5) years, the granted patent term

extension shall still be five (5) years.

The term "pharmaceutical" as set forth in Paragraph 1 does not include any veterinary drug.

When requesting for patent term extension as provided in the Paragraph 1, a request form and

document(s) of proof must be submitted to the Specific Patent Agency within three (3) months after

obtaining the first regulatory approval; no request for patent term extension shall be filed within six

(6) months prior to the expiry of the original patent term.

When making a decision on an application for patent term extension, the Specific Patent Agency

shall take into consideration the impact on public health and shall coordinate with the central

competent authorities in charge of the business to formulate the regulations concerned.

Article 54 Deemed to have been extended

Where a request for patent term extension is filed in accordance with the preceding article, the

patent term shall be deemed to have been extended if the Specific Patent Agency has yet to render a

decision before the original patent term expires. However, where such request for patent term

extension is not allowed, the patent term shall expire on the original expiration date.

Article 55 Assignment of a patent examiner for extension request

The Specific Patent Agency shall assign a patent examiner to examine a request for patent term

extension, render a written decision and serve it on the patentee.

Article 56 Scope of patent term extension

The scope of a patent, of which a term extension has been granted, shall be limited to only the

effective ingredients and use stated in the regulatory approval concerned.

Article 57 Invalidation of patent term extension

Any person may file an invalidation action of the granted patent term extension to the Specific

Patent Agency, together with document(s) of proof, under any of the following circumstances:

1. where it is unnecessary to obtain the regulatory approval to exploit the invention patent

concerned;

2. where neither the patentee nor licensee has obtained the regulatory approval;

3. where the granted term of extension exceeds the period during which the patent cannot be

  exploited;

4. where the requester of the patent term extension is not the patentee;

5. where the regulatory approval of extension request is not the first approval, or a request for

  extension based on the said regulatory approval has been made;

6. where the pharmaceuticals involved in the granted patent term extension are veterinary drugs.

If an invalidation decision revoking the patent term extension has become final and binding, the

granted patent term extension shall be deemed non-existent ab initio. However, if such final and

binding invalidation decision of revocation is rendered due to violation of Subparagraph 3 of
the preceding paragraph, only the exceeding period of the extension shall be deemed non-existent.

Article 58 Effects of invention patent right

Unless otherwise provided for in this Act, the patentee of an invention patent has an exclusive right

to prevent others from exploiting the invention without the patentee’s consent.

Where the invention is a product, exploiting of which means the acts of making, offering for sale,

selling, using, or importing that product for the aforementioned purposes.

Where the invention is a process, exploiting of which means the following acts:

1. using the process; and

2. using, offering for sale, selling or importing for these purposes the product obtained directly by

  that process.

The extent of the protection conferred by an invention patent shall be determined by the claim(s),

and the description and drawing(s) may be considered as a reference when interpreting the claim(s).

The abstract shall not be used for the purpose of interpreting claim(s).

Article 59 Limitations of patent right

The effects of an invention patent right shall not extend to the following circumstances:

1. acts done privately and for non-commercial purpose(s);

2. necessary acts to exploit the invention for research or experimental purpose(s);

3. acts done by a person who has been exploiting the invention or making all the necessary

  preparations for doing such act in this country before the filing date of the invention. However,

this provision shall not apply where the person has learned of the invention from the patent

applicant for less than twelve (12) months and the patent applicant has made a statement

reserving his/her right to a patent being granted;

4. a vehicle merely passing through the territory of this country, or any device of such vehicle;

5. where a patent granted to a person not the owner of the right to apply for a patent is revoked as a

  result of an invalidation action filed by the patentee, acts done by a licensee who has, prior to

invalidation, been exploiting the invention or making all the necessary preparations to do such an

act in good faith;

6. where, after the sale of a patented product made by the patentee or made under consent of the

patentee, using or reselling such product. The making and selling as stated above are not limited

to acts done domestically; and

7. where, after an invention patent is extinguished pursuant to Subparagraph 3, Paragraph 1 of

Article 70 and before it is reinstated and published pursuant to Paragraph 2 of Article 70, acts

done by a person who has been exploiting the invention or making all the necessary preparations

to do such an act in good faith.

The person exploiting the invention as stated in Subparagraphs 3, 5, and 7 of the preceding

paragraph, may continue such exploitation within the original business purpose(s).

A licensee as stated in Subparagraph 5 of Paragraph 1, who continues to exploit the invention after

the patent is revoked, shall pay the patentee a reasonable royalty from the date of receiving a written

notice from the patentee.

Article 60 Limitations of patent right: research and trials of pharmaceuticals

The effects of the patent right shall not extend to research and trials, including their practical

requirements, necessary for obtaining registration and market approval of drugs under the

Pharmaceutical Affairs Act or obtaining market approval of pharmaceuticals from a foreign country.

Article 61 Limitations of patent right: dispensation of medicines

The effects of the patent right for the invention of medicines to be manufactured by mixing two or

more medicines or for the invention of a process thereof shall not extend to the preparing of

medicines in accordance with a prescription from a physician, or the medicines so prepared.

Article 62 Recordation to have locus standi against a third party: transference of patent right

The assigning, entrusting, licensing, or establishing of a pledge on a patent right by the patentee

shall have no locus standi against any third party unless it is recorded with the Specific Patent

Agency.

The license as stated in the preceding paragraph may be an exclusive license or a non-exclusive

license.

An exclusive licensee shall, within the scope of the license granted, exclude the patentee and third

parties from exploiting the patented invention.

Where a patentee establishes multiple pledges on the same patent for the purpose of securing

multiple creditors’ rights, the ranks of these pledges shall be determined according to the order of

their recordation.

Article 63 Sub-licensing

An exclusive licensee may sub-license a third party to exploit the licensed patent unless otherwise

agreed upon by contract.

A non-exclusive licensee shall not be allowed to sub-license a third party to exploit the licensed

patent without the consent of the invention patentee or the exclusive licensee.

The sub-licensing contract shall have no locus standi against any third party unless it is recorded

with the Specific Patent Agency.

Article 64 Disposal of jointly-owned patent right

Where a patent right is jointly owned, except for exploitation by each of the joint owners, it shall

not be assigned, entrusted, licensed, pledged, or abandoned without the consent of all the joint

owner(s).

Article 65 Disposal of one’s own share of jointly-owned patent right

Where a patent right is jointly owned, no joint owner may assign, entrust or establish a pledge on

his/her own share without the consent of all the other joint owner(s).

Where a joint owner of a patent right has abandoned his/her own share, this share shall be vested in

other joint owner(s).

Article 66 Prolongation of patent term

Where an invention patentee has suffered loss as a result of a war between ROC and a foreign

country, the patentee may request for patent term prolongation for five (5) to ten (10) years; only

one such prolongation shall be permitted. However, if the patent is owned by a national from the

foreign country in war with ROC, a request therefor shall not be allowed.

Article 67 Post-grant amendment of invention patent

The patentee filing a request for amending the description, claim(s) or drawing(s) of a granted

invention patent shall only conduct the following:

1. to delete claim(s);

2. to narrow down the scope of claim(s);

3. to correct errors or  translation errors; and

4. to clarify ambiguous statement(s).

Except for correction of translation errors, a post-grant amendment shall not extend beyond the

scope of content disclosed in the description, claim(s), or drawing(s) as filed.

For a patent application for invention filed by submitting the description, claim(s), and drawing(s)

in a foreign language pursuant to Paragraph 3 of Article 25, the correction of translation errors shall

not extend beyond the scope of content disclosed in the original foreign language documents as

filed.

An post-grant amendment shall not substantially enlarge or alter the scope of the claim(s) as

published.

Article 68 Examination of post-grant amendment

The Specific Patent Agency shall designate a patent examiner to conduct examination of post-grant

amendment, render a decision and serve it on the patentee, except for a post-grant amendment filed

in accordance with Article 77.

After approving the post-grant amendment, the Specific Patent Agency shall publish the

examination decision therefor.

Once a description, claim(s) and drawing(s) are amended and published, such post-grant

amendment shall take effect retroactively from the filing date.

Article 69 Restriction on abandoning or amending patent right

A patentee shall not abandon the patent right, or apply for a post-grant amendment as stated in

Subparagraph 1 or 2, Paragraph 1 of Article 67 without the consent from the licensee(s) or

pledgee(s) .

Where a patent right is jointly owned, no joint owner may apply for post-grant amendment as stated

in Subparagraph 1 or 2, Paragraph 1 of Article 67 without the consent from all the joint owner(s).

Article 70 Extinguishment of patent right

An invention patent right shall become extinguished under any of the following circumstances:

1. where the patent term has expired, and the patent shall become extinguished;

2. where the patentee has passed away without heirs;

3. where the annuity of the second or any subsequent years is not paid within the payment time

  period, the patent right shall become extinguished retrospectively after the expiration of the

original due date; or

4. where the patentee abandoned the patent, the patent right shall be extinguished from the date the

patentee makes a declaration in writing.

The patentee who unintentionally fails to pay a patent annuity within the time period for late

payment set forth in Paragraph 1 of Article 94 may apply for reinstatement of the patent rights

within one (1) year after the expiration of the time period of late payment by paying triple the

amount originally due, whereby the Specific Patent Agency shall publish with respect to the above.

Article 71 Grounds for invalidation against invention patent

Any person may request for an invalidation action against an invention patent with the Specific

Patent Agency under any of the following circumstances:

1.where there is a violation of Articles 21 to 24, Article 26, Article 31, Paragraphs 1 and 3 of Article

  32, Paragraph 4 and the forepart of Paragraph 6 of Article 34, Paragraph 2 of Article 43,

Paragraphs 2 and 3 of Article 44, Paragraphs 2 to 4 of Article 67, or Paragraph 3 of Article 108 of

this Act;

2. where the home country of the patentee does not accept the patent applications filed by ROC

nationals; or

3. where there is a violation of Paragraph 1 of Article 12, or where the invention patentee is not the

owner of the right to apply for an invention patent.

An invalidation action based on Subparagraph 3 of the preceding paragraph shall only be filed by

the interested party.

With respect to the ground(s) upon which an invalidation action is based and filed against an

invention patent, the provisions in effect at the time of the said patent being approved shall govern.

However, if an invalidation action is filed based on the ground(s) under Paragraph 4 and the forepart

of Paragraph 6 of Article 34, Paragraph 2 of Article 43, Paragraphs 2 and 4 of Article 67, or

Paragraph 3 of Article 108, the provisions in effect at the time of filing the said action shall govern.

Article 72 Invalidation against extinguished patent

Where the interested party possesses recoverable legal interests due to the revocation of a patent,

such interested party may file an invalidation action after the said patent has become extinguished

ipso facto.

Article 73 Invalidation action

Where an invalidation action is filed, a request form containing a statement and reason(s), along

with evidence shall be provided.

Where a patent contains more than one claim, an invalidation action may be filed against parts of

the claims.

An invalidation statement shall not be modified or added after filing, but it can be narrowed.

A requester of invalidation action may provide invalidation reasons or evidence within three (3)

months after the date of filing the said action.The reason or evidence shall not be examined if the

requester fails to provide them within the specified time period.

Article 74 Invalidation proceedings

Upon receipt of a request form for invalidation action stated in the preceding article, the Specific

Patent Agency shall serve a copy thereof to the patentee.

The patentee shall provide a response within one (1) month after having been served with a copy of

the request form. If the patentee fails to provide such response, the invalidation proceedings shall be

conducted accordingly, unless a request for extension containing reason(s) thereof has been

approved.

During the invalidation proceedings, the patentee shall only file a request for amending the

invention patent when providing a response after having been served with a copy of the request

form, or when providing a response or supplementary response after having been served with a

notification from the Specific Patent Agency. The above shall not apply if a litigation case involving

the invention patent is pending.

The Specific Patent Agency may, when necessary, notify the invalidation requester to submit

comments or the patentee to provide a response or a supplementary response. The invalidation

requester or patentee shall reply within one (1) month after having been served with the notification.

Unless a request for extension thereof has been approved, the comments or response shall not be

examined if the requester or patentee fails to submit comments or provide a response within the

specified time period.

The Specific Patent Agency may conduct invalidation proceedings accordingly if the comment(s) or

the response(s) submitted or provided pursuant to the preceding paragraph is likely to delay the

proceedings or if the facts and evidence are sufficiently clear.

Article 75 Principle of ex officio

When conducting invalidation proceedings, the Specific Patent Agency may, by ex officio, examine

the reason(s) and evidence not provided by the requester of invalidation action but within the scope

of the invalidation statement, and notify the patentee to respond within a specified time period. The

invalidation proceedings shall be conducted accordingly if the patentee fails to respond within the

time period.

Article 76 Interview and inspection in invalidation proceedings

When conducting invalidation proceedings, the Specific Patent Agency may, upon a request or ex

officio, notify the patentee to take any of the following actions within a specified time period:

1. to appear at the Specific Patent Agency for interview; or

2. to conduct necessary experiment(s) or provide model(s) or sample(s).

The Specific Patent Agency may, when necessary, visit the site or a designated place to carry out

inspection on the experiment(s) performed or model(s) or sample(s) to be submitted pursuant to

Subparagraph 2 of the preceding paragraph.

Article 77 Consolidated proceedings of invalidation and post-grant amendment

If, during the invalidation proceedings, a request for post-grant amendment is filed, the said

proceedings and post-grant amendment shall be consolidated; the decisions concerned shall be

jointly rendered as well.

If the Specific Patent Agency considers the said post-grant amendment approvable, it shall serve a

copy of the amended description, claim(s) and/or drawing(s) to the requester of invalidation action.

The above shall not apply if the post-grant amendment is made only to delete claim(s).

Where there are two or more requests for post-grant amendment filed during the proceedings of

same invalidation action, the earlier-filed request(s) for post-grant amendment shall be deemed to

have been withdrawn.

Article 78 Consolidated proceedings of multiple invalidation actions

Where there are multiple invalidation actions filed against the same patent, the Specific Patent

Agency, when necessary, may consolidate the invalidation proceedings of the said actions.

Where the invalidation proceedings have been consolidated pursuant to the preceding paragraph,

decisions concerned may also be rendered jointly.

Article 79 Assignment of a patent examiner for invalidation

When conducting invalidation proceedings, the Specific Patent Agency shall assign a patent

examiner to render a decision and serve it to the patentee and the requester of invalidation action.

Decision on an invalidation action shall be rendered on a claim-by-claim basis.

Article 80 Withdrawal of invalidation action

An invalidation action may be withdrawn by the requester before a decision concerned has been

rendered. However, if the patentee has already submitted a response, such withdrawal shall be

consented by the patentee.

The Specific Patent Agency shall notify the patentee of the withdrawal of an invalidation action. If

the patentee raises no objection within ten (10) days after the notice has been served, it shall be

deemed that the patentee has consented to such withdrawal.

Article 81 Principle of ne bis in idem

Under any of the following circumstances, any person shall not be allowed to separately file an

invalidation action against the same patent based on the same facts and evidence:

1. where another invalidation action has been filed based on the same facts and evidence and

  considered groundless by a decision; or

2. where new evidence is provided to the Intellectual Property Court pursuant to Article 33 of the

Intellectual Property Case Adjudication Act and considered groundless by a judgment.

Article 82 Decision of invalidation action

Where an invalidation action against an invention patent is considered well grounded, the patent

right shall be revoked; such revocation may be made on a claim-by-claim basis.

Revocation of an invention patent right shall become final and binding under any of the following

circumstances:

1. where no administrative remedy proceedings are filed in accordance with laws; or

2. where administrative remedy proceedings are filed but dismissed finally and bindingly.

Where an invention patent is revoked finally and bindingly, the effect of patent right shall be

deemed not to have existed.

Article 83 Procedures to be applied mutatis mutandis to invalidation action against patent term extension

With respect to an invalidation action filed against patent term extension of an invention patent

pursuant to Paragraph 1 of Article 57, the provisions in this Act with respect to invalidation actions

against invention patents shall apply mutatis mutandis.

Article 84 Publication in the Patent Gazette

An invention patent with respect to grant, change, extension, prolongation, assignment, trust,

licensing, compulsory licensing, revocation, extinguishment, pledge establishment , invalidation

decisions, as well as other matters that should be published shall be published in the Patent Gazette.

Article 85 Patent Registry

The Specific Patent Agency shall maintain a Patent Registry, in which the patent grants, changes of

patent rights, and all other matters required by laws shall be registered.

The Patent Registry set forth in the preceding paragraph may be produced electronically and shall

be made available to the public for browsing, transcribing, photographing, or photocopying.

Article 86 Publication by electronic means

Matters which should be laid open and published by the Specific Patent Agency in accordance with

this Act may be done electronically; the date for such implementation shall be decided by the

Specific Patent Agency.

Section 5 Compulsory Licensing

Article 87 Grounds for compulsory licensing

In response to national emergency or other circumstances of extreme urgency, the Specific Patent

Agency shall, in accordance with an emergency order or upon notice from the central government

authorities in charge of the business, grant compulsory licensing of a patent needed, and notify the

patentee as soon as reasonably practicable.

The Specific Patent Agency may, upon request, grant compulsory licensing of a patent under any of

the following circumstances for which it is deemed necessary:

1. where a patented invention is to be exploited non-commercially for the enhancement of public

  interest;

2. where a later invention or utility model patent cannot be exploited without infringing upon a prior

invention or utility model patent, and where the later invention or utility model patent involves an

important technical advancement of considerable economic significance in relation to the prior

invention or utility model patent; or

3. where a patentee has committed acts restricting competition or has committed unfair competition

acts, for which a judgment has been made by a court of law or a decision has been rendered by

the Fair Trade Commission of the Executive Yuan.

Request for compulsory licensing of a patent involving semiconductor technology shall be filed

based on the grounds set forth in Subparagraph 1 or 3 of the preceding paragraph.

Request for compulsory licensing of a patent made pursuant to Subparagraph 1 or 2 of Paragraph 2

may only be approved if the requestor has made efforts to obtain authorization from the right holder

on reasonable commercial terms and conditions, and that such efforts have not been successful

within a reasonable time period.

Where a request for compulsory licensing of a patent is made pursuant to Subparagraph 2 of

Paragraph 2, the owner of the prior patent may propose reasonable terms and conditions and seek

grant of compulsory licensing of the later patent owned by the requestor.

Article 88 Procedure and decision of compulsory licensing

After receiving a request for compulsory licensing filed pursuant to Paragraph 2 of the preceding

Article or Article 90, the Specific Patent Agency shall notify and require the patentee concerned to

respond within a specified time period. If no response is made within the specified time period, the

Specific Patent Agency may then proceed to the examination of the compulsory licensing request.

Exploitation of a compulsory license shall be predominantly for the supply of domestic market. The

above shall not apply to the compulsory license granted pursuant to Subparagraph 3, Paragraph 2 of

the preceding Article.

The decision on a request for compulsory license shall be made in writing and shall indicate the

reasons, scope, duration, and the required remuneration.

Granting of compulsory licensing shall not affect the exercise of patent right by the patentee

concerned.

The right(s) granted under a compulsory license shall not be assigned, entrusted, inherited, licensed

or pledged except for any of the following circumstances:

1. where a compulsory license is granted pursuant to Subparagraph 1 or Subparagraph 3, Paragraph

  2 of the preceding Article and is assigned, entrusted, inherited, licensed or pledged with the

 business involving the exploitation of the patent; or

2. where a compulsory license is granted pursuant to Subparagraph 2 of Paragraph 2 or Paragraph 5

of the preceding Article and is assigned, entrusted, inherited, licensed or pledged with the patent

right of the licensee.

Article 89 Repeal of a compulsory license

Where a compulsory license granted pursuant to Paragraph 1 of Article 87 is considered no longer

necessary by the central government authorities in charge of the business, the Specific Patent

Agency shall repeal the compulsory license upon a notice from the said authorities.

The Specific Patent Agency may, upon request, repeal a granted compulsory license under any of

the following circumstances:

1. where the fact warranting the compulsory license has been changed and compulsory licensing is

no longer necessary;

2. where the licensee fails to properly exploit the patent as required in the compulsory license ; or

3. where the licensee fails to pay the remuneration as determined by the Specific Patent Agency.

Article 90 Compulsory licensing of pharmaceuticals: grounds and procedures

For purposes of assisting countries with insufficient or no manufacturing capacities in

pharmaceutical sector to obtain pharmaceutical product(s) needed for treating HIV/AIDS,

tuberculosis, malaria and other epidemics, the Specific Patent Agency may, upon request, grant a

compulsory license to the requestor to exploit a patent concerned for the purpose of producing and

importing pharmaceutical product(s) to these countries.

Request for a compulsory license made pursuant to the preceding paragraph may only be granted if

the requestor has made efforts to obtain authorization from the right holder on reasonable

commercial terms and conditions and that such efforts have not been successful within a reasonable

period of time; however, the above shall not apply if compulsory licensing of the required

pharmaceutical product(s) has been granted in the importing country.

If the importing country concerned is a WTO member, the requestor shall, when filing a request

pursuant to Paragraph 1, provide document(s) proving that the importing country has fulfilled the

following:

1. the Council for Trade-related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights has been notified of the

name(s) and expected quantities of the  pharmaceutical product(s) needed;

2. the Council for Trade-related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights has been notified of its

  intention as an importer and has established that it has insufficient or no manufacturing capacities

in the pharmaceutical sector. However, such document(s) of proof is not required if the importing

country is a least-developed country; and

3. where the required pharmaceutical product(s) is  not patented in the importing country, or where

the pharmaceutical product(s) is patented in its territory, the importing country has granted or is

about to grant a compulsory license.

The so called "least-developed countries" mentioned in the preceding paragraph refers to countries

announced by the United Nations (UN) as being least-developed countries.

Where the importing country is not a WTO member, but a least-developed country or a country with

insufficient or no manufacturing capacities in the pharmaceutical sector, the requestor shall, when

filing a request for compulsory licensing pursuant to Paragraph 1, provide document(s) proving that

the importing country has fulfilled the following conditions:

1. the name(s) and expected quantities of the pharmaceutical product(s) needed have been filed in

  writing with the foreign affairs authorities of the ROC; and

2. stating that it agrees to prevent re-exportation of the pharmaceutical product(s) needed.

Article 91 Compulsory licensing of pharmaceuticals: export and remuneration

Pharmaceutical product(s) produced under compulsory licensing pursuant to the preceding Article

shall be exported to the importing country entirely, and the quantity of the product authorized to be

produced shall not be more than the quantity required by the importing country in its notice sent to

the Council for Trade-related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights or the foreign affairs

authorities of the ROC.

Pharmaceutical product(s) produced under compulsory licensing granted pursuant to the preceding

Article and the external packaging thereof shall be marked with the licensing basis specified by the

Specific Patent Agency; the packaging, coloring or shaping of the pharmaceutical product(s)

produced under compulsory licensing shall be sufficiently distinguishable from pharmaceutical

product(s) produced by the patentee or his/her licensee(s).

The licensee of a compulsory license shall pay appropriate remuneration to the patentee. The

amount of remuneration shall be decided by the Specific Patent Agency, taking into account the

economic value of the patent of the required pharmaceutical product(s) to the importing country

with reference to the human development index issued by the United Nations.

Before exporting the pharmaceutical product(s) produced under a compulsory license, the licensee

shall post on a website the quantities, name(s) and destination(s) of such pharmaceutical product(s),

as well as distinctive features thereof.

Inspection and registration of the pharmaceutical product(s) produced and exported under

compulsory licensing pursuant to the preceding Article shall not be bound by Paragraph 2, Article

40ter of the Pharmaceutical Affairs Act.

Section 6: Payment of Fees

Article 92 Fees

With respect to each request for patent-related matters, the requestor shall pay fees at the time of

filing.

For a granted invention patent, the patentee shall pay a patent certificate fee and patent annuities. If

extension or prolongation of patent term is allowed, patent annuities shall still be paid during the

extended or prolonged patent term.

Article 93 Time period for payment of annuity

The annuity for an invention patent shall be paid starting from the publication date. Payment of the

first-year annuity shall be made pursuant to the provision set forth in Paragraph 1, Article 52 hereof,

while the payment of the second-year annuity and the annuities thereafter shall be made before the

period thereof expires.

The annuity for several years may be paid at one time. Under such circumstance, if the annuity rate

is adjusted upward, the patentee concerned will not be required to pay the deficit.

Article 94 Addition of annuity

If the annuity for the second or any subsequent year is not paid within the specified time period, a

late payment can be made within six (6) months after the original due date with a specified

percentage addition.

The additional annuities based on the specified percentage addition as stated in the preceding

paragraph means that the  additional annuity shall be paid depending on the amount of time

elapsed from the original due date. For every month that has elapsed, an additional fee at a ratio of

20% shall be paid; the maximum of the additional fee shall be the same as the amount originally due.

The elapsed time from one day to one month shall be deemed as one month.

Article 95 Reduction of annuity

Where the patentee of an invention patent is a natural person, school or small and medium

enterprise, the patentee may request for a reduction of patent annuity with the Specific Patent

Agency.

Section 7 Damages and Litigation Action

Article 96 Right to claim in the event of patent right infringement

A patentee of an invention patent may demand a person who infringes or is likely to infringe the

patent right to stop or prevent such infringement.

In case an infringement of invention patent occurs due to intentional act or negligence, the patentee

may claim for damages suffered therefrom.

When making a demand pursuant to Paragraph 1, the patentee may request for destruction of the

infringing articles or the materials or implements used in the infringing act, or request for other

necessary disposal.

An exclusive licensee may, within the licensed scope, make demands in accordance with the

preceding three paragraphs. However, if it is otherwise provided for in an agreement, such

agreement shall prevail.

Where the inventor’s right to be indicated as such is infringed, the inventor may request for

necessary disposition(s) to have his/her name indicated or to restore the impaired reputation.

The rights to claim as set forth in Paragraph 2 and the preceding paragraph shall become

extinguished if not exercised within two (2) years after the patentee has become aware of the

damage and the person liable for damages. This right shall also become extinguished if it is not

exercised within ten (10) years after the time of infringement.

Article 97 Calculation of damages

The damages claimed pursuant to the preceding article may be calculated according to any of the

following methods:

1. the method as set forth in Article 216 of the Civil Code; if no method of proof can be produced to

  prove the damages suffered, a patentee may claim damages based on the difference between the

profit earned through patent exploitation after infringement and the profit normally expected

through exploitation of the same patent;

2. the profit earned by the infringer as a result of patent infringement; or

3. the amount calculated on the basis of reasonable royalties that may be collected from exploiting

  the invention patent being licensed.

Subject to the preceding paragraph, where the infringement is found to be intentionally committed,

the court may, upon request and on the basis of the severity of the infringement, award the damages

greater than the loss suffered but not exceeding three (3) times of the proven loss.

Article 97-1 Border measures: detention request, security and counter security

A patentee may request Customs to detain the imported articles that are suspected of infringing the

patent right(s).

The request referred to in the preceding paragraph shall be made in wring, accompanied by the

preliminary showing of the facts of infringement and a security amounting to the duty-paid price of

the imported articles, as assessed by Customs, or equivalent assurance.

Customs shall immediately notify the detention requester upon acceptance of the request. Having

deemed such request to be in compliance with the preceding paragraph, Customs shall notify in

writing both the detention requester and the owner of the detained articles when carrying out the

detention.

By providing a security amounting to two times the security or equivalent assurance referred to in

Paragraph 2, the owner of the detained articles may request Customs to repeal the detention and to

follow the procedures under applicable regulations governing customs clearance of imported

articles.

Customs may allow the detention requester or the owner of the detained articles to examine the

detained articles, provided that confidential information protection of the detained articles is not

compromised.

If the detention requester obtains a court judgment deeming that the detained articles infringe the

patent right(s), the owner of the detained articles shall be liable for relevant costs including

demurrage, warehousing, loading, and unloading.

Article 97-2 Border measures: repeal of detention and subsequent procedures

Customs shall repeal the detention in case of any of the following:

1. customs has not been notified by the detention requester, within twelve (12) days following the

date of Customs’ acceptance of the request, that a litigation claiming that the detained articles

infringe the patent right(s) has been initiated in accordance with Article 96;

2. a litigation initiated by the detention requester claiming that the detained articles infringe the

patent right(s) has been dismissed by a final and binding court judgment;

3. a court of law in a final and binding judgment has held that the detained articles do not infringe

patent right(s);

4. the detention requester has requested the repeal of detention; or

5. the condition stated in Paragraph 4 of the preceding article has been met.

If necessary, Customs may extend the time period as prescribed in Subparagraph 1 of the preceding

paragraph by another twelve (12) days.

Customs repealing the detention in accordance with Paragraph 1 shall follow the procedures under

applicable regulations governing customs clearance of imported articles.

If the detention is repealed in accordance with Subparagraphs 1 through 4 of Paragraph 1, the

detention requester shall be liable for relevant costs including demurrage, warehousing, loading, and

unloading.

Article 97-3 Border measures: compensation and return of security

If a court of law in a final and binding judgment has held that the detained articles do not infringe

the patent right(s), the detention requester shall be liable to compensate the owner of the detained

articles for the loss incurred from such detention or from providing the security as prescribed in

Paragraph 4 of Article 97-1.

The detention requester enjoys the same right as a pledgee regarding the security as prescribed in

Paragraph 4 of Article 97-1; the owner of the detained articles enjoys the same right as a pledgee

regarding the security as prescribed in Paragraph 2 of Article 97-1. Notwithstanding the foregoing,

the relevant costs including demurrage, warehousing, loading, and unloading as prescribed in

Paragraph 4 of the preceding article and Paragraph 6 of Article 97-1 shall be paid prior to

compensation for the loss suffered by the detention requester or the owner of the detained articles.

In case of any of the following, Customs shall, upon request from the detention requester, return the

security as prescribed in Paragraph 2 of Article 97-1:

1. the security is no longer required as a final and binding court judgment has been rendered in favor

of the detention requester or the detention requester has reached a settlement with the owner of

the detained articles;

2. where the owner of the detained articles has suffered loss due to a repeal of detention in

  accordance with Subparagraphs 1 through 4, Paragraph 1 of the preceding article, or where a final

and binding court judgment has been rendered in favor of the owner of the detained articles, the

detention requester proves that the owner of the detained articles has been notified to exercise the

right within a specified time period of no less than twenty (20) days but the owner of the detained

articles has yet to do so within the said period; or

3. the owner of the detained articles has agreed upon such return.

In case of any of the following, Customs shall, upon request from the owner of the detained articles,

return the security as prescribed in Paragraph 4 of Article 97-1:

1. the security is no longer required as the detention has been repealed in accordance with

Subparagraphs 1 through 4, Paragraph 1 of the preceding article, or a settlement has been reached

between the owner of the detained articles and the detention requester;

2. where a final and binding court judgment has been rendered in favor of the detention requester,

the owner of the detained articles proves that the detention requester has been notified to exercise

the right within a specified time period of no less than twenty (20) days but the detention

requester has yet to do so within the said period; or

3. the detention requester has agreed upon such return.

Article 97-4 Border measures: formulation of procedural regulations

The competent authority shall, in coordination with the Ministry of Finance, formulate regulations

governing the request of detention, repeal of detention, examination of detained articles, the

procedures involving payment, provision, and return of security or assurance, provision of required

documents, and other requirements, as prescribed in the preceding three (3) articles.

Article 98 Marking of patent certificate number

The patent certificate number shall be marked on the patented article. If such marking cannot be

fixed on the patented article, the patentee may make such marking on the labels or packaging, or

make such marking in a distinct way sufficient to draw people’s attention. Where no patent marking

is made, evidence shall be produced when claiming damages to prove that the infringer knows or

has a reason to know that the said article is under patent protection.

Article 99 Presumption of manufacturing process used

Where an article produced following a manufacturing process is still unknown within and outside of

this country before the filing of a patent application for the manufacturing process, another article

identical thereto made by another person shall be presumed to have been produced following the

said manufacturing process.

The presumption made under the preceding paragraph may be rebutted by providing proof to the

contrary. A proof made by the defendant that the process used in manufacturing the article at issue is

different from the patented process shall be deemed as proof to the contrary. The legitimate rights

and interests with respect to manufacturing and trade secrets disclosed in the defendant‘s evidence

shall be fully protected.

Article 100 Forwarding a certified copy of judgment

A court of law shall forward to the Specific Patent Agency a certified copy of the judgment issued

thereby for a litigation case involving invention patent.

Article 101 Acceleration of invalidation proceedings

Where an invalidation action involves the trial of an infringement litigation case, the Specific Patent

Agency shall give priority to such invalidation proceedings.

Article 102 Unrecognized foreign juristic person or organization

An unrecognized foreign juristic person or organization may file civil suits in respect of the matters

governed by this Act.

Article 103 Patent infringement assessment

A court of law may form specialized tribunal(s) or assign specific staff members to take charge of

invention patent litigation cases.

The Judicial Yuan may designate specialized institution(s) to conduct patent infringement

assessment.

A court of law in processing a litigation pertaining to an invention patent may request the

specialized institution(s) designated according to the preceding paragraph to conduct patent

infringement assessment.

Chapter 3　Utility Model Patent

Article 104 Definition

"Utility model" means the creation of technical ideas relating to the shape or structure of an article

or combination of articles, utilizing the laws of nature.

Article 105 Statutory exclusion

A utility model patent shall not be granted if it is contrary to public order or morality.

Article 106 Filing date

An application for a utility model patent shall be filed with the Specific Patent Agency by the owner

of right to apply for a patent by providing a request form, a description, claim(s), an abstract, and

drawing(s).

The filing date of a patent application for utility model shall be the date on which the request form,

description, claim(s), and drawing(s) are provided in full.

Where an applicant does not provide a description, claim(s) and drawing(s) in Chinese at the time of

filing, but in a foreign language, and where the Chinese translation for the said documents is

provided within the time period specified by the Specific Patent Agency, the filing date shall be the

date on which the foreign language version is originally provided.

Where the Chinese translation is not provided within the specified time period as stated in the

preceding paragraph, the patent application shall be dismissed; however, if the Chinese translation is

provided before the dismissal decision is served, the date on which the Chinese translation is

provided shall be regarded as the filing date, and the foreign language version shall be deemed not

to have been provided.

Article 107 Divisional application of utility model patent

A patent application for utility model which substantially contains two or more utility models may,

upon notice by the Specific Patent Agency or upon request by the applicant, be divided into two or

more divisional applications.

A request for division shall be filed within the time periods specified below:

1. prior to the rendering of a decision on the original utility model application; or

2. within three (3) months after the date on which an approval decision on the original utility model

application is rendered.

Article 108 Conversion of application

Where a patent application originally filed for invention or design is converted into a patent

application for utility model, or where a patent application originally filed for utility model is

converted into a patent application for invention, the filing date of the original patent application

shall be deemed to be the filing date of the converted patent application.

A request for patent conversion shall not be made under any of the following circumstances:

1. after a written decision allowing the original patent application is served;

2. two (2) months after the date on which a written decision rejecting the original patent application

  for invention or design is served; or

3. thirty (30) days after the date on which a written decision rejecting the original patent application

for utility model is served.

A converted patent application shall not extend beyond the scope of content disclosed in the

description, claim(s), or drawing(s) of the original patent application as filed.

Article 109 Amending patent application

When conducting formality examination of a patent application for utility model, the Specific Patent

Agency may, upon request or by ex officio, notify the applicant to amend the description, claim(s)

or drawings within a specified time period.

Article 110 Foreign language documents

The description, claim(s), and drawing(s) of an application for utility model that are provided in a

foreign language pursuant to Paragraph 3 of Article 106 shall not be amended.

The Chinese translation provided pursuant to Paragraph 3 of Article 106 shall not extend beyond the

scope of content disclosed in the original foreign language documents as filed.

Article 111 Decision of Formality Examination

Upon completion of the formality examination of a patent application for utility model, a written

decision shall be rendered and served on the applicant.

When a patent application for utility model is determined to be unpatentable after formality

examination, the reason(s) therefor shall be given in the written decision.

Article 112 Formality examination

A patent application for utility model undergoing formality examination shall be rejected under any

of the following circumstances:

1. where the utility model does not relate to the shape, structure of an article or combination of

articles;

2. where there is a violation of Article 105;

3. where there is a violation of Paragraph 4 of Article 26, applicable mutatis mutandis under Article

  120;

4. where there is a violation of Article 33, applicable mutatis mutandis under Article 120;

5. where the description, claim(s), or drawing(s) does not disclose the essential matters or the

disclosure therein is obviously unclear;

6. where an amendment obviously extends beyond the scope of content disclosed in the description,

claim(s) or drawing(s) as filed.

Article 113 Grant of patent; publication

A claimed utility model shall be patented if, after formality examination, there is no event negating

its patentability, and the claim(s) and the drawing(s) thereof shall be published.

Article 114 Patent term

The term of a utility model patent shall expire after a period of ten (10) years starting from the filing

date.

Article 115 Request for technical evaluation report

After a patent application for utility model is published, any person may file a request with the

Specific Patent Agency for a technical evaluation report of utility model patent.

The Specific Patent Agency shall publish in the Patent Gazette the  request for the technical

evaluation report of utility model patent.

The Specific Patent Agency shall assign a patent examiner to issue the technical evaluation report of

utility model patent, and the report shall bear the name of the assigned patent examiner.

In regard of the request filed pursuant to Paragraph 1, the Specific Patent Agency shall issue the

technical evaluation report of utility model patent with respect to matters set forth in Subparagraph

1, Paragraph 1, Paragraph 2 of Article 22, applicable mutatis mutandis under Article 120, Article 23,

applicable mutatis mutandis under Article 120, and Article 31, applicable mutatis mutandis under

Article 120.

In regard of a request for the technical evaluation report of utility model patent made pursuant to

Paragraph 1, if stated therein that the utility model patent is commercially exploited by a party other

than the patentee and if relevant document(s) of proof  is provided, the Specific Patent Agency

shall issue the technical evaluation report of utility model patent within six (6) months.

Request for a technical evaluation report of utility model patent can still be filed after the utility

model patent has become extinguished.

Request filed pursuant to Paragraph 1 shall not be withdrawn.

Article 116 Presentation of technical report

When exercising a utility model patent, the patentee shall not make a warning without presenting

the technical evaluation report of utility model patent.

Article 117 Liability of damages; immunity

Where a utility model patent is revoked, the patentee shall be liable for the damages suffered by

another person due to the patentee’s exercise of utility model patent right prior to its revocation. The

above shall not apply if such exercise is based on the content of the technical evaluation report of

utility model patent and carried out with due care.

Article 118 Post-grant amendment of utility model patent

With the exception to the situation set forth in Paragraph 3 of Article 74, applicable mutatis

mutandis under Article 120, the patentee requesting to amend a utility model patent shall do so only

within the time periods specified below:

1. a request for technical evaluation report of the utility model patent is pending.

2. a litigation case involving the utility model patent is pending.

Article 119 Grounds for invalidation action against utility model patent

Any person may request for an invalidation action against a utility model patent with the Specific

Patent Agency under any of the following circumstances:

1. where there is a violation of Article 104, Article 105, Paragraph 3 of Article 108, Paragraph 2 of

Article 110, Article 22 applicable mutatis mutandis under Article 120, Article 23 applicable

mutatis mutandis under Article 120, Article 26 applicable mutatis mutandis under Article 120,

Article 31 applicable mutatis mutandis under Article 120, Paragraph 4 and the forepart of

Paragraph 6 of Article 34 applicable mutatis mutandis under Article 120, Paragraph 2 of Article

43 applicable mutatis mutandis under Article 120, Paragraph 3 of Article 44 applicable mutatis

mutandis under Article 120, Paragraphs 2 to 4 of Article 67 applicable mutatis mutandis under

Article 120 of this Act;

2. where the home country of the patentee does not accept patent applications filed by ROC

nationals; or

3. where there is a violation of Paragraph 1 of Article 12, or where the utility model patentee is not

the owner of the right to apply for a utility model patent.

An invalidation action based on Subparagraph 3 of the preceding paragraph shall only be filed by

the interested party.

With respect to the ground(s) for an invalidation action against a utility model patent, the provisions

in effect at the time of the said patent being approved shall govern. However, if an invalidation

request is filed based on violation of the ground(s) under Paragraph 3 of Article 108, Paragraph 4

and the forepart of Paragraph 6 of Article 34 applicable mutatis mutandis under Article 120,

Paragraph 2 of Article 43 applicable mutatis mutandis under Article 120, or Paragraph 2 and

paragraph 4 of Article 67 applicable mutatis mutandis under Article 120, the provisions in effect at

the time of filing the said request shall govern.

A written decision on an invalidation action shall bear the names of the patent examiners.

Article 120 Provisions applied mutatis mutandis to utility model patent

Article 22, Article 23, Article 26, Articles 28 to 31, Article 33, Paragraphs 3 to 7 of Article 34,

Article 35, Paragraphs 2 and 3 of Article 43, Paragraph 3 of Article 44, Paragraph 2 of Article 46,

Paragraph 2 of Article 47, Article 51, Paragraphs 1, 2 and 4 of Article 52, Paragraphs 1, 2, 4 and 5 of

Article 58, Article 59, Articles 62 to 65, Article 67, Paragraphs 2 and 3 of Article 68, Article 69,

Article 70, Articles 72 to 82, Articles 84 to 98, and Articles 100 to 103 shall apply mutatis mutandis

to utility model patent.

Chapter 4　Design Patent

Article 121 Definition of design

"Design" means the creation made in respect of the shape, pattern, color, or any combination thereof

, of an article as a whole or in part by visual appeal.

For computer generated icons (Icons) and graphic user interface (GUI) applied to an article, an

application may also be filed pursuant to this Act for obtaining a design patent.

Article 122 Substantial conditions

A design which is industrially applicable may be granted a design patent upon application in

accordance with this Act, provided any of the following does not exist:

1. an identical or similar design was disclosed in a printed publication prior to the filing of the

patent application;

2. an identical or similar design was publicly exploited prior to the filing of the patent application;

or

3. the design was known to the public prior to the filing of the patent application.

A design that is without the circumstances prescribed in the preceding paragraph but can be easily

conceived by a person ordinarily skilled in the art based on prior art shall not be patented.

A disclosure made by or against the applicant’s will shall not be deemed as one of the circumstances

that would preclude the grant of an design patent prescribed in the subparagraphs of Paragraph 1 or

the preceding paragraph, provided that the concerned patent application is filed within six (6)

months after the date of the disclosure.

For the publication in a gazette made in this country or a foreign country in accordance with the

laws as the consequence of filing a patent application and made by the applicant’s will, the

preceding paragraph is not applicable.

Article 123 Design deemed as lack of novelty

Where a design claimed in a patent application for design is identical or similar to a design

disclosed in the description or drawing(s) of an earlier-filed patent application for design which is

published after the filing of the later-filed patent application for design, the design patent shall not

be granted; however, this shall not apply where the applicant of the later-filed patent application for

design is also the applicant of the earlier-filed patent application for design.

Article 124 Statutory exclusion

A design patent shall not be granted in respect of any of the following:

1. the shape of an article solely dictated by its function;

2. fine arts;

3. the layout of integrated circuits and electronic circuits; or

4. an article contrary to public order or morality.

Article 125 Filing date

A patent application for design shall be filed with the Specific Patent Agency by the owner of the

right to apply for a patent by providing a request form, description and drawing(s).

The filing date of a patent application for design shall be the day on which the request form,

description and drawing(s) are provided in full.

Where an applicant does not provide a description and drawing(s) in Chinese at the time of filing,

but in a foreign language, and where the Chinese translation for the said documents is provided

within the time period specified by the Specific Patent Agency, the filing date shall be the date on

which the foreign language version is originally provided.

Where the Chinese translation is not provided within the specified time period as stated in the

preceding paragraph, the patent application for design shall be dismissed; however, if the Chinese

translation is provided prior to the dismissal decision is served, the date on which the Chinese

translation is provided shall be regarded as the filing date, and the foreign language version shall be

deemed not to have been provided.

Article 126 Disclosure

The description and drawing(s) shall fully disclose the design in a manner clear and sufficient for it

to be understood and carried out by a person ordinarily skilled in the art of the design.

The manners of disclosure for description and drawing(s) shall be prescribed in the Enforcement

Rules of the Patent Act.

Article 127 Application and restriction of derivative design patent

For two or more similar designs owned by the same person, applications may be filed for a design

patent and its derivative design patent(s).

The filing date of a patent application for derivative design shall not be earlier than the filing date of

the original patent application for design.

A patent application for derivative design filed after the publication of the original design patent is

not acceptable.

An applicant shall not file a patent application for derivative design patent if the design therein is

only similar to another derivative design patent but not to the original design patent.

Article 128 First-to-file principle

Where two or more patent applications are filed for the same or similar design(s), only the

earlier-filed application can be granted. The above shall not apply if the priority date claimed for the

later-filed application is earlier than the filing date of the earlier application.

Where the filing date and the priority date referred to in the preceding paragraph are the same, the

applicants shall be notified to reach an agreement with respect to the matter concerned. If such an

agreement cannot be reached, none of the applications shall be granted. If the said patent

applications are filed by the same applicant, the applicant shall be notified to select one patent

application within a specified time period; failure to make a selection within the time period shall

result in the rejection of all such patent applications.

While the applicants concerned are in the process of reaching an agreement, the Specific Patent

Agency shall require that these applicants report the results of the negotiation within an appropriate

time period. If the said report is not provided within the specified time period, it shall be deemed

that the agreement has not been reached.

The above three paragraphs shall not apply to any of the following:

1. the applications for the original design and its derivative design(s); or

2. the applications for two or more derivative designs that originate from the same design.

Article 129 Unity; design for a set of articles

An application for a design patent shall relate to one design.

Two or more articles belonging to the same class and are customarily sold or used together may be

filed as one design.

A patent application for design shall indicate the article to which the design is applied.

Article 130 Division of application

A patent application for design that substantially contains two or more designs may, upon notice by

the Specific Patent Agency or upon request by the applicant, be divided into two or more divisional

applications.

A request for division shall be made before a reexamination decision on the original application is

rendered.

Examination of a divisional patent application shall resume the completed procedure of the original

patent application.

Article 131 Conversion between design patent and derivative design patent

Where a patent application for design is converted into a patent application for derivative design or

where a patent application for derivative design is converted into a patent application for design, the

filing date of the original patent application shall be deemed to be the filing date of the converted

patent application.

A request for the conversion shall not be made under any of the following circumstances:

1. after a written decision allowing the original application is served; or

2. two (2) months from after the date on which a written decision rejecting the original application

is served.

A converted patent application for design or derivative design shall not extend beyond the scope of

content disclosed in the description or drawing(s) of the original application as filed.

Article 132 Conversion into design patent

Where an application originally filed for invention or utility model patent is converted into a patent

application for design, the filing date of the original application shall be deemed to be the filing date

of the converted patent application for design.

A request for the conversion shall not be made under any of the following circumstances:

1. after a written decision allowing the original patent application is served;

2. two (2) months after the date on which a written decision rejecting the original patent application

for invention is served; or

3. thirty (30) days after the date on which a written decision rejecting the original patent application

for utility model is served.

A converted patent application shall not extend beyond the scope of content disclosed in the

description, claims, or drawings of the original patent application as filed.

Article 133 Foreign language documents

The description and drawing(s) provided in a foreign language pursuant to Paragraph 3 of Article

125 shall not be amended.

The Chinese translation provided pursuant to Paragraph 3 of Article 125 shall not extend beyond the

scope of content disclosed in the original foreign language documents as filed.

Article 134 Grounds for rejection decision

When a patent application for design is in violation of any of the provisions set forth in Articles 121

to 124, Article 126, Article 127, Paragraphs 1 to 3 of Article 128, Paragraphs 1 and 2 of Article 129,

Paragraph 3 of Article 131, Paragraph 3 of Article 132, Paragraph 2 of Article 133, Paragraph 4 of

Article 34 applicable mutatis mutandis under Paragraph 1 of Article 142, Paragraph 2 of Article 43

applicable mutatis mutandis under Paragraph 1 of Article 142, and Paragraph 3 of Article 44

applicable mutatis mutandis under Paragraph 1 of Article 142 of this Act, a decision of rejection

shall be rendered.

Article 135 Patent term of design patent

The term of a design patent shall expire after a period of fifteen (15) years from the filing date of the

application. A derivative design patent shall expire simultaneously with the original design patent.

Article 136 Effects of design patent right

Unless otherwise provided in this Act, the patentee of a design patent has the exclusive right to

prevent others from exploiting the design or similar design(s) without the patentee’s consent.

The extent of the protection conferred by a design patent shall be determined by the drawing(s), and

the description may be considered as a reference.

Article 137 Claim of derivative design patent

The right of a derivative design patent may be claimed independently, and its effect shall be

extended to the scope of similarity.

Article 138 Disposal of derivative design patent

A derivative design patent right shall be assigned, entrusted, inherited, licensed or pledged along

with its original design patent.

Where the original design patent right becomes extinguished or is revoked finally and bindingly

pursuant to Subparagraph 3 or 4, Paragraph 1 of Article 70 applicable mutatis mutandis under

Paragraph 1 of Article 142, the two or more derivative design patents that are still in force shall not

be separately assigned, entrusted, inherited, licensed, or pledged.

Article 139 Post-grant amendment of design patent

The patentee filing a request for amending the description or drawing(s) of a granted design patent

shall only conduct the followings:

1. to correct errors or translation errors; or

2. to clarify ambiguous statement.

Except for correction of translation errors, a post-grant amendment shall not extend beyond the

scope of content disclosed in the description or drawing(s) as filed.

For a patent application for design filed by providing the description and drawing(s) in a foreign

language pursuant to Paragraph 3 of Article 125, correction of translation errors shall not extend

beyond the scope of content disclosed in the original foreign language documents as filed.

A post-grant amendment shall not substantially enlarge or alter the scope of drawing(s) as

published.

Article 140 Restriction on abandoning design patent right

A design patentee shall not abandon his/her design patent right without consent from the licensee(s)

or pledgee(s).

Article 141 Grounds for invalidation

Any person may request for an invalidation action against a design patent with the Specific Patent

Agency under any of the following circumstances:

1. where there is a violation of any of the provisions set forth in Articles 121 to 124, Article 126,

Article 127, Paragraphs 1 to 3 of Article 128, Paragraph 3 of Article 131, Paragraph 3 of Article

132, Paragraph 2 of Article 133, Paragraphs 2 to 4 of Article 139, Paragraph 4 of Article 34

applicable mutatis mutandis under Paragraph 1 of Article 142, Paragraph 2  of Article 43

applicable mutatis mutandis under Paragraph 1 of Article 142 and Paragraph 3 of Article 44

applicable mutatis mutandis under Paragraph 1 of Article 142;

2. where the home country of the patentee does not accept patent applications filed by ROC

nationals; or

3. where there is a violation of Paragraph 1 of Article 12 or where the design patentee  is not the

  owner of the right to apply for a design patent.

An invalidation action based on Subparagraph 3 of the preceding paragraph shall only be filed by

the interested party.

With respect to the ground(s) of an invalidation action against a design patent, the provisions in

effect at the time of the said patent being approved shall govern. However, if an invalidation action

is filed based on the ground(s) under Paragraph 3 of Article 131, Paragraph 3 of Article 132,

Paragraphs 2 and 4 of Article 139, Paragraph 4 of Article 34 applicable mutatis mutandis under

Paragraph 1, Article 142, or Paragraph 2 of Article 43 applicable mutatis mutandis under Paragraph

1, Article 142 of this Act, such invalidation action shall be governed by the provisions in effect at

the time of filing the said action.

Article 142 Provisions applied mutatis mutandis to design patent

The provisions of Article 28, Article 29, Paragraphs 3 and 4 of Article 34, Article 35, Article 36,

Article 42, Paragraphs 1 to 3 of Article 43, Paragraph 3 of Article 44, Article 45, Paragraph 2 of

Article 46, Article 47, Article 48, Article 50, Paragraphs 1, 2 and 4 of Article 52, Paragraph 2 of

Article 58, Article 59, Articles 62 to 65, Article 68, Article 70, Article 72, Paragraphs 1, 3 and 4 of

Article 73, Articles 74 to 78, Paragraph 1 of Article 79, Articles 80 to 82, Articles 84 to 86, Articles

92 to 98, and Articles 100 to 103 shall apply mutatis mutandis to design patent.

In the case of a patent application for design, the time period specified in Paragraph 1 of Article 28

shall be six (6) months.

In the case of a patent application for design, the time period specified in Paragraphs 2 and 4 of

Article 29 shall be ten (10) months.

In the case of a patent application for design, the time period specified in Subparagraph 3,

Paragraph 1 of Article 59 shall be six (6) months.

Chapter 5　Supplementary Provisions

Article 143 Preservation of patent files

Patent files such as application documents, description, claim(s), abstract, drawing(s) deemed worth

preserving by the Specific Patent Agency shall be permanently kept.

Patent files not referred to in the preceding paragraph shall be kept for the duration specified below

1. invention patent files shall be  preserved for 20 years except for  the files of approved cases,

  which shall be preserved for 30 years.

2. utility model patent files shall be  preserved for 10 years except for  the files of approved cases,

which shall be preserved for 15 years.

3. design patent files shall be  preserved for 15 years except for  the files of approved cases,

which shall be preserved for 20 years.

The duration of preservation referred to in the preceding paragraph shall be calculated on the first

day of the year following the decision is rendered on the patent application, the patent application

has been withdrawn or deemed to have been withdrawn.

With respect to patent files which are kept at the time of the implementation of the April 16, 2019,

amendment to this Act, the amended Patent Act shall apply.

Article 144 Prescription of regulations governing awards for creations

The competent authority may prescribe the regulations governing awards for the creations of

inventions, utility models, or designs.

Article 145 Prescription of regulations governing submission of foreign language documents

With respect to foreign language documents provided pursuant to Paragraph 3 of Article 25,

Paragraph 3 of Article 106, and Paragraph 3 of Article 125, the competent authority shall prescribe

regulations governing the types of foreign languages and other matters.

Article 146 Prescription of regulations governing fees

With respect to the application fee, patent certificate fee and annuity set forth in Article 92, Article

92 applicable mutatis mutandis under Article 120, and Article 92 applicable mutatis mutandis under

Paragraph 1 of Article 142, the competent authority shall prescribe regulations governing the

methods of collection therefor.

With respect to the reduction or exemption of patent annuities as set forth in Article 95, Article 95

applicable mutatis mutandis under Article 120, and Article 95 applicable mutatis mutandis under

Paragraph 1 of Article 142, the competent authority shall prescribe regulations governing the

conditions, number of years, amount, and other matters therefor.

Article 147 Transitional provisions: patent term extension

A patent application filed before January 23, 1994 shall not apply for patent term extension under

Article 53.

Article 148 Transitional provisions: patent term

With respect to a patent that is published prior to the implementation of the January 21, 1994,

amendment of this Act, the patent term thereof shall be calculated in accordance with the Patent Act

in effect prior to the 1994 amendment. However, for an invention patent that is still in force on the

date when the WTO Agreement took effect in the territory of the ROC, the patent term thereof shall

be governed by the amended Act.

For a utility model patent that is published prior to the implementation of the January 3, 2003,

amendment of this Act, the patent term thereof shall be governed by the Patent Act in effect prior to

the amendment.

For a design patent that is still in force on the date when the WTO Agreement takes effect in the

territory of the ROC, the patent term shall be governed by the May 7, 1997, amendment of the

Patent Act.

Article 149 Transitional provisions: pending cases

Unless otherwise provided for in the Act, for a patent application which is still pending at the time

of the implementation of the November 29, 2011, amendment of this Act, the amended Patent Act

shall govern.

With respect to a request for post-grant amendment and invalidation action which is still pending at

the time of the implementation of the November 29, 2011, amendment of this Act, the amended

Patent Act shall govern.

Article 150 Transitional provisions: Priority claim based on earlier application; division

With respect to a patent application for invention or utility model which is filed prior to the

implementation of the November 29, 2011, amendment of this Act with priority claim made

pursuant to the former Article 29, if the prior patent application has not been published or the

decision of rejection has not become final and binding, Paragraph 1 of Article 30 shall apply.

With respect to an examination decision regarding patent application for invention rendered prior to

the implementation of the November 29, 2011, amendment to this Act, if the time period stated in

Subparagraph 2, Paragraph 2 of Article 34 has not expired, Subparagraph 2, Paragraph 2 and

Paragraph 6 of Article 34 shall apply.

Article 151 Transitional provisions: grace period; design patent

Subparagraph 2, Paragraph 3 of Article 22, Subparagraph 2, Paragraph 3 of Article 22 applicable

mutatis mutandis under Article 120, Paragraph 1 of Article 121, which pertains to partial design of

articles, Paragraph 2 of Article 121, Subparagraph 1, Paragraph 3 of Article 122, Article 127, and

Paragraph 2 of Article 129 shall be applicable only to patent applications filed after the

implementation of the November 29, 2011, amendment of this Act.

Article 152 Transitional provisions: deposit of biological material

In respect of a patent application for invention that violates the former Paragraph 2, Article 30 and

the deposits therefor is deemed not to have been made before the implementation of the November

29, 2011, amendment, if the application is still pending at the time of the implementation, Paragraph

2 of Article 27 shall apply. For a patent application to which priority claim is made, if the time

period of sixteen (16) month after the earliest priority date has not expired, Paragraph 3 of Article

27 shall apply.

Article 153 Transitional provisions: Priority claim under WTO membership, etc.

In respect of a patent application that, prior to the implementation of the November 29, 2011,

amendment of this Act, violates the former Paragraph 1 of Article 28, Paragraph 1 of Article 28

applicable mutatis mutandis under Article 108, or Paragraph 1 of Article 28 applicable mutatis

mutandis under Paragraph 1 of Article 129 of this Act, and therefore cannot claim priority pursuant

to the former Paragraph 3 of Article 28, Paragraph 3 of Article 28 applicable mutatis mutandis under

Article 108, or Paragraph 3 of Article 28 applicable mutatis mutandis under Paragraph 1 of Article

129 of this Act, in the event that the patent application is still pending at the time of the

implementation, if, with respect to a patent application for invention and utility model, the period of

sixteen (16) months after the earliest priority date has not expired, and if, with respect to a patent

application for design, the period of ten (10) months after the earliest priority date has not expired,

Paragraph 4 of Article 29, Paragraph 4 of Article 29 applicable mutatis mutandis under Article 120,

and Paragraph 4 of Article 29 applicable mutatis mutandis under Paragraph 1 of Article 142 shall

apply.

In respect of a patent application that, prior to the implementation of the November 29, 2011,

amendment of this Act, violates the former Paragraph 2 of Article 28, Paragraph 2 of Article 28

applicable mutatis mutandis under Article 108, or Paragraph 2 of Article 28 applicable mutatis

mutandis under Paragraph 1 of Article 129 of this Act, and therefore cannot claim priority pursuant

to the former Paragraph 3 of Article 28, Paragraph 3 of Article 28 applicable mutatis mutandis under

Article 108, or Paragraph 3 of Article 28 applicable mutatis mutandis under Paragraph 1 of Article

129 of this Act, in the event that the patent application is still pending at the time of the

implementation, if, with respect to a patent application for invention and utility model, the period of

the sixteen (16) months period after the earliest priority date has not expired, and if, with respect to

a patent application for design, the period of ten (10) months after the earliest priority date has not

expired, the provisions of Paragraph 2 of Article 29, Paragraph 2 of Article 29 applicable mutatis

mutandis under Article 120, and Paragraph 2 of Article 29 applicable mutatis mutandis under

Paragraph 1 of Article 142 shall apply.

Article 154 Transitional provisions: request for patent term extension

In respect of a request for invention patent term extension that is filed prior to the implementation of

the November 29, 2011, amendment of this Act, if the decision has not been issued for such a

request and if the invention patent is still in force at the time of the implementation, the amended

Act shall govern.

Article 155 Transitional provisions: no revival of extinguished patent right

If any of the following events exists at the time of the implementation of November 29, 2011,

amendment of this Act, Paragraph 4 of Article 52, Paragraph 2 of Article 70, Paragraph 4 of Article

52 applicable mutatis mutandis under Article 120, Paragraph 2 of Article 70 applicable mutatis

mutandis under Article 120, Paragraph 4 of Article 52 applicable mutatis mutandis under Paragraph

1 of Article 142, and Paragraph 2 of Article 70 applicable mutatis mutandis under Paragraph 1 of

Article 142 shall not apply:

1. where, at the time of the said implementation, the time period for payment of annuity has expired

  and the patent concerned has become non-existent ab initio pursuant to the former Paragraph 1 of

Article 51, Paragraph 1 of Article 101, or Paragraph 1 of Article 113 of this Act; or

2. where, at the time of the said implementation, a patent has become  extinguished pursuant to the

former Subparagraph 3 of Article 66, Subparagraph 3 of Article 66 applicable mutatis mutandis

under Article 108, or Subparagraph 3 of Article 66 applicable mutatis mutandis under Paragraph 1

, Article 129 of this Act.

Article 156 Transitional provisions: pending patent application for design

In respect of a patent application for design that is still pending at the time of the implementation of

the November 29, 2011, amendment of this Act, the applicant may, within three (3) months after the

implementation, file a request to convert it to a patent application for partial design.

Article 157 Transitional provisions: pending patent application for associated design

In respect of a patent application for associated design that is still pending at the time of the

implementation of the November 29, 2011, amendment of this Act, the provisions of this Act prior

to amendment with respect to associated design patent shall apply.

In respect of a patent application for associated design that is still pending at the time of the

implementation of the November 29, 2011, amendment of this Act, if the patent application for

associated design is filed prior to the publication of its original patent application for design, the

applicant may file a request to convert it to a patent application for derivative design within three (3)

months after the implementation of the amended Act.

Article 157-1 Transitional provisions: grace period

Article 22, Article 59, Article 122 and Article 142 amended on December 30, 2016 shall be

applicable only to patent applications filed after the implementation of the said amendment to this

Act.

Article157-2 Transitional provisions: pending applications

Unless otherwise provided for in the Act, for a patent application which is still pending at the time

of the implementation of the April 16, 2019, amendment to this Act, the amended Patent Act shall

apply.

With respect to a request for post-grant amendment and invalidation action which is still pending at

the time of the implementation of the April 16, 2019, amendment to this Act, the amended Patent

Act shall apply.

Article157-3 Transitional provisions: Divisional application after rendering a decision of patent application

With respect to an examination decision on patent application for invention or utility model

rendered prior to the implementation of the April 16, 2019, amendment to this Act, if the

corresponding time period set forth in Subparagraph 2, Paragraph 2 of Article 34 or Subparagraph 2,

Paragraph 2 of Article 107 has not expired, Subparagraph 2, the amended Patent Act shall apply.

Article157-4 Transitional provisions: patent term of design patent

With respect to the term of a design paten, when the term of the patent has not expired prior to the

implementation of the April 16, 2019, amendment to this Act, the amended Patent Act shall apply.

With respect to the term of a design patent, when the patent right has become extinguished pursuant

to Subparagraph 3, Paragraph 1 of Article 70 applicable mutatis  mutandis under Paragraph 1 of

Article 142 prior to the implementation of the April 16, 2019, amendment to this Act, and then has

been reinstated through an application made according to Paragraph 2 of Article 70 applicable

mutatis mutandis under Paragraph 1 of Article  142 after the implementation of the April 16, 2019,

amendment to this Act, the amended Patent Act shall apply.

Article 158 Prescription of Enforcement Rules

The Enforcement Rules of this Act shall be prescribed by the competent authority.

Article 159 Date of implementation

The date on which this Act takes effect shall be decided by the Executive Yuan.

The May 31, 2013 amendment of this Act is to be implemented on the date of its promulgation.